Masks, false safety and real dangers · Primary Doctor - Medical Journal (study)

Want to know why masks don't work and are actually causing harm if You use them, then You should read this 'Primary Doctor - Medical Journal' study: "Masks, false safety and real dangers"

by: Boris Borovoy, Colleen Huber, Maria Crisler

---

(.. click the cover to visit site with all parts or any one of the three parts bellow ↓ ..)

---

●

Abstract

There is no biological history of mass masking until the current era. It is important to consider possible outcomes of this society-wide experiment. The consequences to the health of individuals is as yet unknown.Masked individuals have measurably higher inspiratory flow than non-masked individuals. This study is of new masks removed from manufacturer packaging, as well as a laundered cloth mask,examined microscopically. Loose particulate was seen on each type of mask. Also, tight and loose fibers were seen on each type of mask. If every foreign particle and every fiber in every facemask is always secureand not detachable by airflow, then there should be no risk of inhalation of such particles and fibers. However, ifeven a small portion ofmask fibers isdetachable by inspiratory airflow,or if there is debris in mask manufactureor packaging or handling,then there is the possibility of not only entry of foreign material to the airways, but also entry to deep lung tissue, andpotentialpathological consequences of foreign bodies in the lungs.

●

Abstract

Face masks have comeinto common use in many countries since mid-2020, for all agegroups. Some aspect of this may be voluntary, but certainly much of this use is either accompanied by force, threats, subtle coercion, or a continuum of subtle to fierce societal pressures on the individual to conform to mask-wearing. From widespread fear of COVID-19, associated withthe virus named SARS-CoV2, mask-wearing is recently assumed by many to be a prudent measure against contagion. In this paper, the second in our series, we continue our examination of the potential hazards of masks, in which we now turn attention to microbial contamination from masks and mask use, changes in oral and nasal microbiota, and potential risks to the lungs and other organ systems from microbial factors. Because widespread masking is a very new society-wide experiment, the impact of this experiment, the obstruction of airways from free breathing and a typical air exchange interplay with oral microbiota is not yet known. Furthermore, the effects of such changes in the lungs and beyond are not yet known. This paper will explore some considerations of these changes, by examining mask effectiveness against transmission, historical evidence of epidemiology from the 1918-1919 pandemic, microbial contamination, respiratory disease and the role of oral bacteria in systemic disease; and infections involving fungi, yeast,and molds. Compiling statistical and scientific evidence from these subjects alone should help equip any individual with adequate information on risks and benefits when choosing whether to wear a mask.

●

Abstract

Wearing a mask causes physiological changes to multipleorgan systems, including the brain, the heart, thelungs, the kidneys andthe immune system. We examinechanges inoxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations in masked airspace that is available to the airwaysover the first 45 seconds of wear. Our findings of reduced oxygen and increased carbon dioxide in a masked airspace are not inconsistent with previously reported data.We also consider the range of injuries knownto occur to the above-named organ systems in a state of hypoxia and hypercapnia.As an excretory pathway, carbon dioxide release by cells throughout the body, and thenpastthe alveoli and then the airways and orifices,has not been previously challenged by deliberate obstruction in the history of the animal kingdom, except for relatively rarehuman experiments.Self-deprivation of oxygen is also unknown in the animal kingdom, and rarely attempted by humans. We examine the physiological consequences of this experiment.

Tweet